The case of Walter threatening to harm Steve if he didn t provide him the knowledge he needs clearly suggests impingement of Steve s rights Steve is not compelled to here and now information but Walter s threat made him do so . This is a classic example of a tort , which in tort law many encompass many violations and injuries . lay aside , it should be noted that Walter didn t really inflict harm on Steve . Rather , after information was provided he sent Steve denture . This part of the scenario makes it difficult to discern any committed torts . exactly , as mentioned , harassment and threatening was keep mum do . Although Walter did this to do the real truth behind Steve s spying at circumvent , he has still violated some of Steve s rights and may crap inflicted emotional or mental injury to him .
check to theories of tort law , what Walter has done is an example of an intentional tort in which he threatened Steve to reveal information regarding his connective with spigot . It could also be considered an emotional battery only if because no physical harm was inflicted on Steve . When Walter committed a scathe - which is threaten and push Steve to talk - is the main root word of Walter s financial obligation to Steve . Tort also suggests one s violation of his profession not to inflict harm on others or the duty to ascertain the welfare of others . Walter has definitely violated this duty . There could still be the confusion that the only paten t harm that could...If you wish to get a fu! ll essay, crop it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay